Rivalry Comments:

  First Page   Previous Page   79    80    81    82    83    Next Page   Last Page

  • Thomas Sims - 7/27/11 @ 8:39 AM
    I just have a hard time believing anybody innocent in this case. To some degree, the State didn't show anything but circumstantial evidence however, what mother would not report a toddler missing? Caylee wasn't reported missing for over 30 days! What mother would lie to Law Enforcement Officers about their Child's disappearance? Yet, Casey was found guilty on 4 counts of just that, providing false information to Law Enforcement Officers. Now, let me ask you this question! If your toddler went missing, how long would you wait to report it? State thought they had a good case and I thought there was enough to convict on something other then those 4 measly counts of false information. Waiting for such a long time to report a toddler missing, especially in this day and age is a crime in itself. Casey had admitted she wants to have another child and I hope that CPS steps in and takes it. Casey is more interested in the party life then anything else and this just proves it.

  • The Boss - 7/26/11 @ 11:39 PM
    Alright you foul mouthed son of a &*#!?$! The language filter is now in place. Navigate to "edit profile" on your menu drop down. Then click on privacy setting and disengage the language filter so all of your potty language is there for you to see.

    One bit of bad news. All of your previous profanity will remain censored as the censor was put in place before inserting the data into the database. Aside from going back and editing all of the bad words there is nothing I can do so you'll have to make up for it and cuss like sailors from now own. sorry it took so long. Do let me know if there are any problems with it.



  • DollyFan - 7/25/11 @ 11:10 PM
    Not a big fan of food stamps (EBT). Ran a convenience store for many, many years and saw food stamps get used for soft drinks, candy, chips, etc. which is bad enough since there is no health value to these items. BUT then after buying these "food" items with food stamps, they turn around and use cash to purchase cigarettes, beer and lottery tickets. Definitely needs to be stipulations on what food can be purchased and also how long people can be on welfare!


  • DollyFan - 7/25/11 @ 10:53 PM
    It may have been stated to the elusion of slavery but there is no reason not to say slavery. It's part of our history that we may be ashamed of but we should learn from our mistakes and not just try to quietly let our errors slip by. The war is mostly remembered as the South wanting slavery to continue and the North wanting slavery to be abolished but it was really about the national government trying to hold the nation together and not let states succede from the Union. The nastiness and unfairness of slavery just causes that to be the issue that most people take away from such a death filled war that turned many brothers against brothers.

  • DollyFan - 7/25/11 @ 10:47 PM
    I wouldn't pay a fee. FB already makes millions from advertisers, so believe me when I say thay are making a profit. Don't think we need to worry about them not being able to eat. I would just go back to calling, texting, emailing, etc., if there was a fee. FB has done it all these years and made money, no reason that it should have to change now.

  • DollyFan - 7/25/11 @ 10:44 PM
    He was doing something immoral and should be out of Congress. We may not be able to stop a neighbor or co-worker from doing this but we expect more out of our voted representatives!

    But you posting the video about the "internet switch" is a tool to help sway the vote. This video has nothing to do with the question and should not be on here. In my opinion, you tend to try to sway votes by showing something negative that does not pertain to the question on hand. It then turns me off of the site after seeing it over and over on many questions. Just my two cents.

  • DollyFan - 7/25/11 @ 10:32 PM
    I would agree to stop paying in. I am currently paying into a borken program and won't see anything come back to me when I retire, so I may as well stop contributing and have the money for myself to invest as I see fit and try for a better retirement. It may be a lose-lose situation but COULD be a lose-win situation.

  • DollyFan - 7/25/11 @ 10:29 PM
    I believe in an amendment for a balanced budget, as our government should not be spending money that we do not have. BUT there would have to be stipulations as to how a balanced budget can be achieved and not have it just left up to the politicians to decide to do anything they want to make it balance. Just like allowing a local government to pass a wheel tax. It may seem useful and inexpensive when it begins but then there is no stopping them when they raise the amount again and again.... We must always be careful about letting the politians' foot in the door because then there is no stopping them!

  First Page   Previous Page   79    80    81    82    83    Next Page   Last Page