There is no way I could support a balanced budget Amendment unless the budget was limited to a fixed percentage of GDP.
Let's stop and think about this for a minute. Initially a Balanced Budget Amendment sounds great to any small government personal liberty loving American but the problem is that if it's not set to a fixed amount of GDP the fools in Washington can tax there way out of budget shortfalls.
Let's imagine for a minute that the progressives in DC decide to pass another entitlement program; I know it's hard to believe that they could come up with anything else (We pay for educations, power bills, cell phones, food in many forms, housing, health care, etc...) but humor me. What happens when the entitlement program goes the way of medicare and social security (Yes I know SS is paid into by individuals but you were the fools who allowed them to deposit that money into the general fund instead of putting it under lock and key in an independent account and now we're all going to pay for it) and the costs skyrocket. No problem! They can simply attempt to balance the budget by raising taxes. Don't be fooled into bipartisan support of this measure unless it is specifically locked in at a percentage of GDP.
I've actually grown very fond of netflix since we got high speed internet fast enough to stream hd. I also watch a ton of movies on my cell phone. I've had the $7.99 streaming only plan for a while now and have no intentions on hexing it due this price increase since it's not affecting my bill. I hate it for those who have streaming and dvd's though. That sucks.
I was only using it for streaming mostly. I had a few blu rays sent to the house but I canceled my subscription yesterday. Id rather just get my movies from P to P.
Very well put. Imagine a joke. Someone tells you funny joke, you attempt to tell someone else that joke and end up modifying it because we're all a bit stupid and can't remember things word for word or in my case I slaughter the joke. Now times that by two thousand years; a lot of room for discrepancies.
I personally think blind faith is stupid. Im not saying your stupid. i think believing in something becasue everyone thinks its what your supposed to beleive in is wrong. Lets assume for a moment that the Kind James verson of the bible wasnt the first version and every other version since was someones interpretation of and translation of something else. Its not that i dont believe in A god, its that i dont beleive in the one that man created.
I'll ask you, who wrote the Christian Bible? Do you believe the literal interpretation of Genesis?Do you limit the way in which your god creates?
You were pretty specific about who was "stupid" and that they don't believe in gods.Generalizations are never very wise.
Trust me the point was not missed; I simply don't agree. What you are saying is the jurors can live on with a clear conscience and that's great for them. However Justice was not served for Caylee Anthony.
The crime was murder. If her mother didn't do it then justice will not be served until the person who did is punished. However, if her mother did do it justice will never be served due to double jeopardy laws. It's not a misunderstanding, it's a difference of opinions.
Because they spend their entire lives trying to disprove everything that has to do with him. I never said Anyone and Everyone that does not believe in God is "Stupid". I do feel for those who don't believe.
Let's stop and think about this for a minute. Initially a Balanced Budget Amendment sounds great to any small government personal liberty loving American but the problem is that if it's not set to a fixed amount of GDP the fools in Washington can tax there way out of budget shortfalls.
Let's imagine for a minute that the progressives in DC decide to pass another entitlement program; I know it's hard to believe that they could come up with anything else (We pay for educations, power bills, cell phones, food in many forms, housing, health care, etc...) but humor me. What happens when the entitlement program goes the way of medicare and social security (Yes I know SS is paid into by individuals but you were the fools who allowed them to deposit that money into the general fund instead of putting it under lock and key in an independent account and now we're all going to pay for it) and the costs skyrocket. No problem! They can simply attempt to balance the budget by raising taxes. Don't be fooled into bipartisan support of this measure unless it is specifically locked in at a percentage of GDP.
You were pretty specific about who was "stupid" and that they don't believe in gods.Generalizations are never very wise.
The crime was murder. If her mother didn't do it then justice will not be served until the person who did is punished. However, if her mother did do it justice will never be served due to double jeopardy laws. It's not a misunderstanding, it's a difference of opinions.