2.) Can't hear the audio so I'll be watching this one on the desktop soon.
3.) Fox issued an apology for production mistake.
4.) Still trying to get this video to load (No luck, just plays the 3 second intro to comedy central) but you have a problem with this one. I WAS THERE! (40 buses from TN alone 40 x 50 = 2000 and we met people from nearly every state.) and I can tell you with absolute certainty there was well over 15 thousand people so super lib Stewart is way off base.
Keep searching and feel free to leave them here publicly; that's not a problem.
I could do the same for CNN, MSNBC, ABC, etc... but effortlessy googling scandal doesn't represent truly trying to find the truth and actually checking your sources; huffington post, really?
Feel free to look at the crowd yourself: this is from the front with my limited view of the crowd. You can see the crowd grow through the series of pictures as I was one of the first people there and one of the last to leave. http://www.flickr.com/photos/jealousbrother/sets/72157622626266259/
The reason I asked is because the point of my statement was basically this part "just because they don't vote for that side doesn't mean they automatically agree that the President is in fact assassinating Americans."
Which is why I said the rivalry is leading. You don't offer a real option other than to agree with your basic statement - that Obama is assassinating Americans - which is a sensationalist statement.
I'm not just giving one liners. I just don't care to go into more detail about than than to point out the absurdity of arguing Fox's legitimacy. There's more than enough evidence to convince any sound minded person that Fox news not only is deceptive but outright lies.
The fact that you say you have respect for them means you are either unaware of the lies or... something, I don't know. To be clear I don't trust any media either. I take care to research on my own until I'm either satisfied or disinterested. All I'm saying is this guy gave a response and it seems legit. What else would you expect him to say? That he was literally in a coma so he didn't know?
I'm saying you should ask reasonable questions rather than make such an accusation.
The video is weak at best. The excuse Bob Schieffer gave was embarrassing as a journalist. Sorry, if CNN can't do better than that I stand by my opinion.
Fox was only mentioned in the description because they are the only ones seriously covering this news story.
While it's obvious you don't have any respect for Fox that's fine; I do. I also have some (minimal at this point) respect for CNN which is why it was so troubling when I discovered their obvious bias with the black panther case. I'm hoping you at least took the time to look at the blog post referenced in my first response as I'm not slamming CNN with a one liner like you enjoy doing with Fox; I actually support my claims with evidence (see blog post).
You have every right to dislike Fox and there are plenty of things I have seen with Fox that I don't like. One example was when they actually tried to silence guests from mentioning the Keating Scandal when McCain was running for office. The problem is that you seem to have absolute faith in CNN and other left leaning media while I have no faith in any media.
Even the shows I enjoy I question and research before I take anything they say for fact.
This particular case has corrupt and racial bias written all over it. What do you think would have happened if this was a clansman intimidating voters? Make no mistake, Black Panthers are the black equivalent to the KKK. Preach the power of one race to the other.
FYI, I'm not sure if you realize this but the guy in both videos is the same individual and Eric Holder allowed the dismissal of the case.
And for the record I'm very confident that there are people who would have no problem with the president (any president) authorizing the murder of an American citizen if the president informed them that they are involved with terrorism or plots against the US.
The problem with that way of thinking is that you put trust in the administration in question to be accurate with their intel and motive. (WMD's in Iraq) Does that ring a bell about intel and motive?
2.) Can't hear the audio so I'll be watching this one on the desktop soon.
3.) Fox issued an apology for production mistake.
4.) Still trying to get this video to load (No luck, just plays the 3 second intro to comedy central) but you have a problem with this one. I WAS THERE! (40 buses from TN alone 40 x 50 = 2000 and we met people from nearly every state.) and I can tell you with absolute certainty there was well over 15 thousand people so super lib Stewart is way off base.
Keep searching and feel free to leave them here publicly; that's not a problem.
I could do the same for CNN, MSNBC, ABC, etc... but effortlessy googling scandal doesn't represent truly trying to find the truth and actually checking your sources; huffington post, really?
Feel free to look at the crowd yourself: this is from the front with my limited view of the crowd. You can see the crowd grow through the series of pictures as I was one of the first people there and one of the last to leave. http://www.flickr.com/photos/jealousbrother/sets/72157622626266259/
http://www.good.is/post/classy-fox-erases-applause-from-obama-s-west-point-speech
http://www.politicususa.com/en/maddow-fox-news
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/18/fox-news-runs-old-palin-c_n_362897.html
http://current.com/news/91428089_stewart-catches-fox-news-falsifying-footage-to-make-gop-protest-look-bigger.htm?xid=RSSfeed
There's 4 I found in 10 minutes. I could keep going...?
Which is why I said the rivalry is leading. You don't offer a real option other than to agree with your basic statement - that Obama is assassinating Americans - which is a sensationalist statement.
The fact that you say you have respect for them means you are either unaware of the lies or... something, I don't know. To be clear I don't trust any media either. I take care to research on my own until I'm either satisfied or disinterested. All I'm saying is this guy gave a response and it seems legit. What else would you expect him to say? That he was literally in a coma so he didn't know?
I'm saying you should ask reasonable questions rather than make such an accusation.
While it's obvious you don't have any respect for Fox that's fine; I do. I also have some (minimal at this point) respect for CNN which is why it was so troubling when I discovered their obvious bias with the black panther case. I'm hoping you at least took the time to look at the blog post referenced in my first response as I'm not slamming CNN with a one liner like you enjoy doing with Fox; I actually support my claims with evidence (see blog post).
You have every right to dislike Fox and there are plenty of things I have seen with Fox that I don't like. One example was when they actually tried to silence guests from mentioning the Keating Scandal when McCain was running for office. The problem is that you seem to have absolute faith in CNN and other left leaning media while I have no faith in any media.
Even the shows I enjoy I question and research before I take anything they say for fact.
This particular case has corrupt and racial bias written all over it. What do you think would have happened if this was a clansman intimidating voters? Make no mistake, Black Panthers are the black equivalent to the KKK. Preach the power of one race to the other.
FYI, I'm not sure if you realize this but the guy in both videos is the same individual and Eric Holder allowed the dismissal of the case.
The problem with that way of thinking is that you put trust in the administration in question to be accurate with their intel and motive. (WMD's in Iraq) Does that ring a bell about intel and motive?