http://www.jealousbrother.com/ Stay up to date with conversation taking place in the rivalries on JealousBrother.com en-us http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/noob-hacker Jason Gunning wrote: ME2! ]]> Thu, 16 May 2013 10:05:52 -0400 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/noob-hacker&Comment=7952 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/noob-hacker Ryan Kazinec wrote: I prefer the ignorance of a newb more than the arrogance of a hacker. ]]> Tue, 14 May 2013 21:02:12 -0400 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/noob-hacker&Comment=7951 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/tornado-vs-earthquake Jason Gunning wrote: Earthquakes aren't cool. ]]> Tue, 14 May 2013 15:40:07 -0400 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/tornado-vs-earthquake&Comment=7950 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/apple-iii-lisa Jason Gunning wrote: I'd take the Apple LISA. ]]> Tue, 14 May 2013 15:38:42 -0400 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/apple-iii-lisa&Comment=7949 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/apple-iii-lisa Ryan Kazinec wrote: It's actually been nearly this long since I've owned an Apple product. Going on looks I'd go with the Apple III. ]]> Sat, 11 May 2013 19:03:23 -0400 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/apple-iii-lisa&Comment=7948 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/north-korea-bluffing-threat-kim-jong-real Jeff wrote: I think he just crazy enough to do it ]]> Sun, 21 Apr 2013 21:28:31 -0400 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/north-korea-bluffing-threat-kim-jong-real&Comment=7947 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/jesus-proven-existed-prove Tim Donk wrote: Better jump on this quick while I have a bit of down time. Back tracked? I stated from the beginning that there is no contemporary evidence for Jesus, the writers of his time are completely silent. If Jesus existed, he wasn't a very big deal. You keep asking for proof,which I don't have. Neither do I have proof for the nonexistence of unicorns, fairies, Djinns, Sprites,Robin Hood etc. Maybe you can define what it is that you wish to see as proof, because I'm not understanding. I have fully a]]> Sun, 21 Apr 2013 01:14:28 -0400 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/jesus-proven-existed-prove&Comment=7946 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/north-korea-bluffing-threat-kim-jong-real LIBERAL wrote: While I do not believe that North Korea is bluffing, I do NOT consider them a real threat. For the love of God they can't even get a missile more than a 100 feet off of the launch pad. The only real threat they pose is to themselves. Not to mention the firepower and technology for which the United States already possesses, and has since the early 1950's. With the advent of post 9/11 intelligence I don't believe North Korea will be planning any successful surprise attack any time soon. Entering w]]> Mon, 15 Apr 2013 12:50:24 -0400 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/north-korea-bluffing-threat-kim-jong-real&Comment=7945 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/royal-tenenbaums-vs-rushmore maddy crossie wrote: Im not on anyones side ]]> Tue, 09 Apr 2013 20:08:32 -0400 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/royal-tenenbaums-vs-rushmore&Comment=7944 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/north-korea-bluffing-threat-kim-jong-real DollyFan wrote: Definitely a real threat. We don't need to be in another war, though, so I sure hope it doesn't come to that. ]]> Mon, 08 Apr 2013 18:07:21 -0400 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/north-korea-bluffing-threat-kim-jong-real&Comment=7943 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/jesus-proven-existed-prove LIBERAL wrote: I understand. No problem. Just get back to me whenever you can. ]]> Sun, 31 Mar 2013 22:29:16 -0400 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/jesus-proven-existed-prove&Comment=7942 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/jesus-proven-existed-prove Tim Donk wrote: Not done here brother, it's balls to the wall at work and I haven't had time to do much more than work and sleep....maybe this weekend I can address this issue. ]]> Thu, 28 Mar 2013 05:42:59 -0400 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/jesus-proven-existed-prove&Comment=7941 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/jesus-proven-existed-prove LIBERAL wrote: Forgive me, but I've been extremely busy the last couple of weeks. I know my responses have been somewhat sporadic regarding time. I'll begin with taking issue with your very first statement. Exactly how can the first century CE be so well documented if a great deal of the documents were destroyed by "christians"? Second, why would the "christians" be the people destroying the documents when so many of them would have proven the existence of the historical Jesus. I wish to see your so-called ]]> Sat, 16 Mar 2013 22:07:40 -0400 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/jesus-proven-existed-prove&Comment=7940 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/jesus-proven-existed-prove Tim Donk wrote: The first century CE is very well documented and a great deal of the documents that were destroyed were destroyed by Christians as "heretical". So we are right back where we started. There is no physical or contemporary evidence that Jesus existed. Not sure what it is that you want to see of my research. I have read many books on the subject,from both sides of the argument, listened to many debates and lectures, countless websites and shoe boxes full of little notebooks and post it notes that I ]]> Wed, 06 Mar 2013 13:24:27 -0500 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/jesus-proven-existed-prove&Comment=7939 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/jesus-proven-existed-prove LIBERAL wrote: Your evidence presented actually proves less than nothing Donk. Much of that period was never recorded. It's of no historical or empirical proof that next to nothing was recorded concerning Jesus considering the fact that much of that age was either never recorded or has unfortunately been lost or destroyed since. Lack of evidence neither proves nor disproves Jesus' existence. I question your motive though concerning this entire thread. If you asked the question, then surely you believe you have]]> Tue, 05 Mar 2013 20:31:32 -0500 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/jesus-proven-existed-prove&Comment=7938 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/jesus-proven-existed-prove Tim Donk wrote: For all that has been claimed for Jesus, all his miracles, his confrontations with Jewish officials,his fame "far and wide"(now being downplayed by apologists)earthquakes ,dead men walking the streets etc. etc. Not a single writer during the time of the events bothered recording any of it. Not Philo Not Seneca Not Plutarch Not Justus Not Damis Not Pliny the Elder...... Pliny the Younger (61-111 CE) Suetonius(75-150CE) Josephus (37-c.100 CE) ]]> Tue, 05 Mar 2013 13:01:12 -0500 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/jesus-proven-existed-prove&Comment=7937 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/-dorner-caped-crusader-hero-christopher-cold-blooded-murderer LIBERAL wrote: Simply put, there is no excuse for this man's behavior. Violence almost always begets more violence. If he had intended to make a statement, or otherwise bring to light corruption within his own police department there were certainly more peaceable means with which to do so. He was a monster at best, and at worst a coward of the highest order. ]]> Sun, 03 Mar 2013 22:50:12 -0500 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/-dorner-caped-crusader-hero-christopher-cold-blooded-murderer&Comment=7936 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/sequestration-continue-kick-kids LIBERAL wrote: You would have thought after the elections at both the state and national levels that Republicans would have learned a very valuable lesson. If they lose the majority of their seats in 2014 effectively handing the majority back to the Democrats they have only themselves to blame. Just as the American government will not negotiate with terrorists, neither will the American people negotiate or support those who hold our government hostage simply for the sake of their own gain. Though I know a]]> Sun, 03 Mar 2013 22:10:36 -0500 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/sequestration-continue-kick-kids&Comment=7935 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/jesus-proven-existed-prove LIBERAL wrote: Not quite yet. Been a little busy lately. I apologize. So, you appear to be a little smarter than the average bear. You didn't fall for my trick. Good. Still, you haven't provided any evidence of his non-existence. Here's a few links you might be interested in. Let me know what you think. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pliny_the_Younger#Epistle_concerning_the_Christian_Religion http://http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suetonius#The_Great_Fire_and_the_Christiani http://http://en.wikipedia.]]> Sun, 03 Mar 2013 21:34:39 -0500 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/jesus-proven-existed-prove&Comment=7934 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/jesus-proven-existed-prove Tim Donk wrote: Are we done? ]]> Tue, 26 Feb 2013 02:02:51 -0500 http://www.jealousbrother.com/rivalries/jesus-proven-existed-prove&Comment=7933