-1 Mr. Kazinec12/04/09:By taking this side I'm not saying I would vote for her in 2012 but compared to our current President's experience she is every bit as qualified (More qualified actually)as him.
-1 mama kaz12/06/09:I have a friend who has lived in Alaska for the past 30 years and she says Palin is the best thing that ever happened to Alaska. I think one of her best attributes is her ability to stand up to corruption. Obama said he was going to stop the lobbying and yet it is now at an all time high. Lobbying is a huge part of the problem in this country and I don't see anyone on the horizon (other than Palin) who has the strength, courage, and desire to stand up to this large and corrupt group of people who are running this country behind closed doors. Palin fought very powerful people in Alaska and did it with one hand tied behind her back while raising five kids! Just because someone is different doesn't make them wrong. Obama is polished and well spoken on teleprompters but is making decisions on a daily basis that show he is too inexperienced for the office and very few people are discussing that. Sarah Palin ran Alaska and did it very well. What did Obama accomplish before being elected to office? What did he accomplish while he was in the Senate? I really would love to know because I have been unable to find anything of any substance.
+1 Tomegun12/07/09:Ryan, can you write something for my site stating why Palin is a good candidate?
This is a problem of perspective for me. I think we, Americans, have a big problem with keeping things in perspective.
Tiger Woods is in a bind because he didn't have perspective. His money attracted beauty - about 10 of them including the one he married. Now, his money will have to be used to rebuild his image.
Look at CNN. Are you really telling me that the women on that channel are the only ones qualified to do their job?
We lose perspective because we allow beauty to sway decisions. Don't get me wrong, when I began the process of dating my wife, I liked the way she looked, but I think that is different.
I have said this before and I will say it again: Palin would not be where she is if she didn't look how she does.
+0 Mr. Kazinec12/07/09:
Although I wouldn't want to put together a cheerleading post for Palin that does give me an idea on something I could write. Time is currently in short supply but It is certainly overdue for a guest post on http://www.7daybuzz.com . As soon as I can I'll start jotting some stuff down.
-1 mama kaz12/27/09:Saying that Palin would not be where she is if she didn't look good is a very sexist thing to say. She is where she is because she has the courage to say the things that a very large number of Americans are thinking. She already has a proven record of standing up to big business and the corruption that goes with it. I don't know many politicians today who can say that. I believe we are moving towards a point in history where the average Joe is tired of business as usual and is beginning to look for someone who will step forward and lead in a different way. I'm not sure if Palin is it but I'm watching her very closely right now. We need some real change.
-1 mama kaz5/01/10:
Why? What do you base your opinion on? Or are you the typical liberal who just hates her because its the thing to do. I would really love to hear your reasons.
Add new comment: You must either login or register before you can comment.